Skip to content
OPG Registration · England & Wales

Why LPAs get rejected

Answer

An LPA is rejected when the Office of the Public Guardian cannot register it — most often because sections 9, 10 and 11 were signed in the wrong order, the certificate provider was not eligible, or a correction was made with fluid rather than initialled. Registering costs £92; correcting and reapplying within three months costs £46.

Almost none of it is about judgement or wording. It is about the order of three signatures, who was allowed to sign, and whether a crossing-out was initialled — and the Office of the Public Guardian publishes every rule it applies. This page maps each cause to the section of the form it comes from.

Sources: the LP1F and LP1H forms, OPG guidance, and gov.uk. Checked 4 August 2026.

Caring for a Parent — £79
§I

Rejected, returned, severed: three different outcomes

"Rejected" is a single word covering three quite different outcomes, and which one you are dealing with decides what it costs. The Office of the Public Guardian checks three things before it registers an LPA: that the LPA is legally correct, that it has no errors, and that anyone entitled to object has had the chance.

Outcome 1

Returned for correction

The commonest outcome. Something on the form can be put right, so the papers come back with a covering letter explaining what. Correct it, and you can apply again within 3 months for a reduced fee of £46. The gov.uk wording matters here: "depending on the type of mistake, OPG may let you correct it and apply again." Not every mistake qualifies.
Outcome 2

Cannot be registered at all

Some defects cannot be corrected on the existing document — a signing order that makes the instrument invalid, correction fluid over an entry, LP1F and LP1H pages mixed together. The remedy is a fresh LPA, newly signed and newly paid for, which is only possible while the donor still has capacity.
Outcome 3

Referred to the Court of Protection

Where the wording of an instruction is not legally valid, the OPG has a statutory duty to apply to the Court of Protection to have that wording severed — struck out so the rest can be registered. The document survives; the sentence does not. This is the slowest of the three routes.
The distinction the page must draw early — an objection is not a rejection. A rejection is the OPG's own decision that the paperwork does not work. An objection is a third party saying the LPA should not be registered at all — and it is a separate process, on separate forms, with a separate deadline: anyone sent a notice under LP3 has three weeks from being told to object. There is a legal four-week wait before the OPG can register any LPA where people have been notified, which exists precisely to leave room for that.

The paragraph that earns this page its links — the capacity cliff. The OPG's registration guide puts it without decoration: "If there are mistakes, OPG can't register the LPA and it can't be used." An LPA held unregistered in a drawer has not been checked by anyone. If the donor loses capacity before the error surfaces, the mistake can no longer be corrected — a donor without capacity cannot re-sign a document. What is left is an application to the Court of Protection, either for a deputyship or for a declaration that the LPA can be treated as valid — currently £432 to apply, before anything else.

This is the practical argument for registering immediately rather than "when it is needed": registration is the only quality check that exists, and it only works while it can still be acted on. Related: the capacity situation guide and the COP1 deputyship guide.

§II

The signing order

Signing out of order is the largest single cause of returned applications, and the least forgiving. The signatures are not three formalities on the same document — they are a sequence, and each one certifies something about the state of the document at the moment it was made. A certificate provider cannot certify that a donor understood a document the donor had not yet signed.

#Who signsWhereOnly after
1The donor signs and datesLP1H section 5 — life-sustaining treatment(health & welfare LPA only)
2The donor's witness signsLP1H section 51
3The donor signs and datescontinuation sheets 1 and 2(only if used; same date as section 9)
4The donor signs and datessection 91–3
5The donor's witness signssection 94
6The certificate provider signs and datessection 105
7Every attorney and replacement attorney signs and datessection 116
8Each attorney's witness signssection 117
9The applicant signs and datessection 158 — all section 11s complete

The signatures can be dated the same day or different days — the form says so explicitly. What cannot happen is a later step carrying an earlier date than the step before it. The LP1F checklist puts it in one line: "Sections 9, 10 and 11 were signed in order. Section 9 must have been signed first, then section 10, then section 11."

The trap that catches families. The order is most often broken by convenience, not carelessness. Everyone is in the room; the attorney signs section 11 while the pen is out; the certificate provider is seen the following week. The document is now out of order and no amount of goodwill puts it back — the sequence is the evidence, and the dates are the record of it. If the family cannot all be in the same room, sign in the published order across several days, and let the dates show it.
Section 15's date. Section 15 is the signature that applies to register, and it is dated after every section 11. Where attorneys were appointed jointly, all of them must sign section 15. A section 15 dated before the last attorney signed is a returned application, even where sections 9, 10 and 11 are flawless.
§III

The rejection map

Every cause below is drawn from the OPG's own published guidance or from the wording printed on the form itself. The causes are grouped by the part of the document they come from, because that is how you check a form — page by page, not by category of error.

A

The signatures

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
Sections 9, 10, 11 signed out of sequence9 · 10 · 11Not validly executed. Usually a fresh LPA
Certificate provider signed before the donor10As above — section 10 certifies section 9
An attorney signed before the certificate provider11As above
Section 15 dated before the last attorney signed15Returned; the application is out of order
Jointly-appointed attorneys, and not all signed section 1515Returned
An attorney or replacement never signed at all11Returned — all of them must sign
Donor could not sign and someone signed for them without continuation sheet 39 + CS3Returned
B

The certificate provider

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
A family member of the donor or of an attorney — including in-laws and step-relatives10Not eligible. Fresh certificate, or fresh LPA
An attorney or replacement attorney named in the LPA10Not eligible
An unmarried partner, boyfriend or girlfriend of either10Not eligible
A business partner, or the donor's employee10Not eligible
Staff at a care home where the donor lives, or their family10Not eligible
A friend who has not known the donor two years, and has no relevant professional skill10Not eligible
C

The witnesses

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
An attorney witnessed the donor's signature9 (and 5 on LP1H)Returned
The donor witnessed an attorney's signature11Returned
Witness under 185 · 9 · 11Returned
Witness gave initials, not first name(s) and last name5 · 9 · 11Returned
Witness address missing or incomplete5 · 9 · 11Returned
One asymmetry worth knowing, because it surprises people: one attorney may witness another attorney's signature at section 11. What no attorney may do is witness the donor.
D

The form itself

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
Correction fluid or a sticker used anywhereanyThe OPG cannot register it — new LPA, new fee
A correction not initialled, or initialled by the wrong personanyReturned. Whoever made the error initials it
Pencil used, or handwriting that cannot be readanyReturned
A page missing — all pages 1 to 20, including the information page at section 8whole formReturned
Pages stapled, bound or fixed togetherwhole formReturned — send them loose
LP1F and LP1H pages mixed in one documentwhole formMay require a new LPA and a new fee
Printing faults — text running onto the next page, form not matching the version on gov.ukwhole formReprint before signing
Corrections have a specific form and it is not optional: strike the wrong entry through with a single line, write the correct entry beside it, and have the person who made the mistake write their initials next to it. A witness's wrong address is initialled by the witness, not by the donor.
E

The details

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
A name that is not the full name on the person's identification1 · 2 · 4Returned
Date of birth not in DD/MM/YYYY1 · 2 · 4Returned
Address incomplete, or postcode missing1 · 2 · 4Returned
LP1H — neither option A nor option B chosen at section 5, or both signed5 (LP1H)Errors here "may result in you having to make a new LPA"
People named at section 6 not notified on LP3 before the application was sent6 + LP3Cannot proceed
Reduced fee claimed without LPA120 and evidence14 + LPA120Delayed or refused
F

The wording — covered in full in §IV below

What goes wrongWhereWhat it means
An instruction incompatible with a jointly and severally appointment3 + 7Court of Protection severance
An instruction incompatible with a joint appointment3 + 7Court of Protection severance
Gifts wider than section 12 of the Mental Capacity Act allows7Court of Protection severance
An unlawful instruction7Must be removed before registration
A health instruction on an LP1F, or a money instruction on an LP1H7Wrong document
§IV

Wording the Court of Protection has to remove

Section 7 is optional, most people leave it blank, and it produces a disproportionate share of the delays. The form's own warning is blunt: "if you give instructions that are not legally correct they would have to be removed before your LPA could be registered." Removing them is not something the OPG can do on its own.

Where the OPG considers a provision invalid, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires it to apply to the Court of Protection to have that provision severed. The court can strike wording out; it has no power to write different wording in. The rest of the LPA is then registered without it — which means the donor ends up with a document that no longer says what they intended, having waited months longer for it.

Most common

Contradicts joint and several

Appointing attorneys jointly and severally means each of them may act alone, at any time, on equal terms. An instruction that then qualifies it — decisions above £2,000 must be taken together, at least two must act, in a disagreement A's view prevails, B may act only if A cannot, one attorney handles the business and the other everything else — contradicts the appointment and is severed. In Re Public Guardian's Severance Applications [2023] EWCOP 24, Hayden J held: "if a donor appoints more than one attorney on a joint and several basis, it must be understood that equality prevails." Majority rule is not one of the ways the Act permits attorneys to be appointed, and cannot be added by instruction.
Reverse case

Contradicts a joint appointment

Appointing attorneys jointly means they must all act together on everything. Saying that the survivor may carry on alone, or that a majority may decide, is severed for the same reason in reverse. What a donor generally wants here is a replacement attorney at section 4 — which is provided for, and lawful.
Statutory limit

Gifts beyond the statutory power

Section 12 of the Mental Capacity Act lets an attorney make gifts on customary occasions and to charity, within limits. Instructions authorising anything wider are severed: gifts made to reduce inheritance tax, continuing a pattern of regular giving, school fees or trust funds for grandchildren, interest-free family loans. An attorney who needs to do any of those applies to the Court of Protection at the time — it is not something the LPA can pre-authorise.

The safe division is the one the form itself draws. Preferences use prefer and would like, and are guidance the attorneys should keep in mind. Instructions use must and have to, and bind them. If a sentence does not need to bind anyone, it belongs in the preferences box, where it cannot be severed — or in a conversation, which is where the form suggests most of it belongs. Related: the making an LPA guide.

§V

What it costs, and what happens next

Registering an LPA costs £92, and £184 for the usual pair. What a returned application costs depends entirely on which of the three outcomes in §I you are in.

SituationWhat you payNote
First application£92 per LPA£184 for both types
Corrected and reapplied within 3 months£46 per LPA"Depending on the type of mistake" — not every error qualifies
Reapplied after 3 months£92 againThe reduced fee window has closed
A fresh LPA is required£92 againAnd the donor must still have capacity to sign it
Donor's income under £12,000Half feeClaim on LPA120 with evidence
Donor on a qualifying means-tested benefitNo feeClaim on LPA120 with evidence
Universal Credit no longer qualifies a donor for a full exemption on its own, a change that has applied since 2 February 2026 — a UC recipient is instead assessed for the 50% remission against the £12,000 income test. Two related changes come with it: the OPG no longer accepts retrospective remission or exemption claims, and a repeat application needs a fresh LPA120 and fresh evidence — the claim made with the first application does not carry over.

Registration takes 8 to 10 weeks where there are no mistakes. The OPG's average across 2024–25 was 49 working days, against a 40-working-day target that includes the four-week statutory notice period. A returned application does not resume from where it stopped; it starts again, so a small error at section 11 typically costs a further two to three months, not two to three weeks.

The order that protects a family is: make it, register it, then keep it findable. Registration is the only point at which anyone independently checks the document, and there is no fast-track service for the day it turns out to matter. Related: the LPA fees figures page.

§VI

The check before you post

The OPG publishes its own final-check list. The version below is that list, reordered so the things that actually get applications returned come first.

1

Sections 9, 10 and 11 are signed in that order, and the dates prove it. On an LP1H, section 5 was signed and witnessed before section 9.

2

Section 15 is dated after every section 11. Jointly-appointed attorneys applying together have all signed it.

3

The certificate provider is eligible — not family, not an attorney, not an unmarried partner, not a business partner, not care-home staff. A lay certificate provider has known the donor well for at least two years.

4

No attorney witnessed the donor, and the donor witnessed no attorney. Every witness is over 18 and has given a full name and an address.

5

LP1H only — one option at section 5, A or B, signed and witnessed. Not both.

6

No correction fluid, no stickers. Every correction is struck through once and initialled by the person who made it.

7

Black or blue pen throughout, no pencil, handwriting legible.

8

All 20 pages are present — including the information page at section 8 and any page left blank — and nothing is stapled or bound.

9

Every page carries the same form code, LP1F or LP1H, and nothing has printed across a page break.

10

LP3 has gone to everyone named at section 6 before the application is posted, and any reduced-fee claim has LPA120 and its evidence attached.

Then it goes to the Office of the Public Guardian, PO Box 16185, Birmingham B2 2WH — loose, in order, with nothing missing.

None of the above is the hard part. The hard part is the years after, when the LPA is registered correctly and nobody can find it, and nobody knows which accounts it was made for. That is the part Valoren keeps.

England & Wales only. Scotland runs continuing and welfare powers of attorney registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (Scotland); Northern Ireland runs enduring powers of attorney. Neither uses the section numbers on this page.

Figure watch · checked weekly

The figures on this page change.

Court fees rise, thresholds move, deadlines shift.

This card watches the same way your Valoren records would — leave an email and we'll tell you when one changes, once, then stop.

Email me when the LPA signing order and fee changes on this page change. Only when a figure actually moves — never sales.

One email · then we stop · Privacy
Free guide

Making the LPA in the first place

The parent explainer this page is downstream of — how to word section 7, choosing joint or joint and several, the full application walkthrough.

Read the guide
Caring for a Parent · £79

Keep the household record once it's registered

The part this page doesn't cover — where the sealed copies live, which accounts the LPA was made for, and who can find it when it's needed.

See what's included
FAQ

Common questions

Because something on the form stops it being registrable — a paperwork failure, not a judgement on anyone involved. The Office of the Public Guardian checks that the LPA is legally correct, that it contains no errors, and that anyone entitled to object has had the chance. In practice the recurring causes are a signing order out of sequence, a certificate provider who was not eligible, a witness who should not have witnessed, a correction made with fluid, or a page missing.

The donor first, then the certificate provider, then the attorneys. On a health and welfare LPA the donor signs section 5 and is witnessed there before anything else, then any continuation sheets, then section 9 with a witness. The certificate provider signs section 10 only after that. Every attorney and replacement signs section 11 only after section 10. The applicant signs section 15 last of all.

Usually you start again. Gov.uk says only that "depending on the type of mistake, OPG may let you correct it and apply again within 3 months for £46" — and an out-of-sequence signature is not a clerical slip that can be initialled away, because the sequence is what each signature certifies. Expect to need a fresh LP1F or LP1H, freshly signed in order, and a fresh £92. That is only possible while the donor still has capacity.

Anyone with an interest in the LPA or a close tie to it. Excluded are: an attorney or replacement attorney named in the document; a family member of the donor or of any attorney, including in-laws and step-relatives; an unmarried partner, boyfriend or girlfriend of either; a business partner; the donor's employee; and staff at a care home where the donor lives, or their families. A lay certificate provider must have known the donor well for at least two years.

No. An attorney or replacement attorney cannot witness the donor at section 9, or at section 5 on a health and welfare LPA. The donor equally cannot witness an attorney at section 11. One attorney may, however, witness another attorney's signature at section 11 — that one is permitted. Every witness must be over 18 and give a full name and address, not initials.

£46 per LPA if the OPG allows a correction and you apply again within three months. After three months, or where the document has to be made again from scratch, it is the full £92. A reduced-fee or exemption claim does not carry over from the first application — a repeat application needs a fresh LPA120 and fresh evidence, a rule that has applied since 2 February 2026 alongside the withdrawal of automatic exemption for Universal Credit.

It cannot be fixed. Correcting or re-signing an LPA requires the donor to have capacity, so a defect discovered afterwards leaves the family applying to the Court of Protection instead — for a deputyship, or for a declaration that the instrument can be treated as valid. The application fee alone is £432, and the process runs in months. It is the strongest argument for registering an LPA as soon as it is signed rather than holding it unregistered.

Because an instruction that is not legally valid can only be struck out by the court, not by the OPG. Where the OPG considers a provision invalid it has a statutory duty to apply for that wording to be severed, and the court can only remove the words — it cannot replace them with better ones. The commonest causes are instructions that contradict how the attorneys were appointed, and instructions authorising gifts wider than the Mental Capacity Act allows.

Part of a working library79form walkthroughs90+free guidesevery calculator & checker

We use first-party analytics only — no third parties, no ad tracking — to see which pages actually help people. You can keep that off. Privacy