Before you apply — confirming lack of capacity
The Court can only act if the person (referred to as 'P' throughout the COP process) lacks mental capacity to make the decision in question.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets a specific two-part test for this — the Court will not accept a general statement that someone has dementia or a diagnosis of a condition.
The two-part MCA capacity test
P must both: (1) have an 'impairment of, or disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain' (the diagnostic threshold — satisfied by dementia, brain injury, severe learning disability, or similar conditions); AND (2) be unable to make the specific decision because of that impairment.
Unable means unable to: understand the relevant information; retain it long enough to make a decision; weigh it as part of a decision-making process; or communicate the decision.
Capacity is decision-specific
A person may have capacity to make some decisions (what to eat, where to sit) but not others (managing investments, selling a property).
The application must specify which decisions P cannot make — the Court will only grant authority over those specific decisions.
If P regains capacity for a decision, the deputyship must not be used for that decision.
Form COP3 — the capacity assessment
COP3 must be completed by a 'professional with relevant expertise': typically P's GP, a consultant, a psychiatrist, or an approved mental health professional.
It is not enough for a family member to state P lacks capacity — a medical professional must complete and sign COP3.
Without COP3, the Court will not process the application.
Budget time (and possibly a fee) for the GP or specialist to complete this.
What if P retains partial capacity?
If P can still make some financial decisions, the Court may make a 'one-off' order for a specific transaction (e.g. authorising the sale of a property) rather than appointing a deputy.
One-off orders are faster and cheaper than deputyship.
If the need is a single transaction rather than ongoing management, consider applying for a specific order rather than a full deputyship.
The Court can only act if the person (referred to as 'P' throughout the COP process) lacks mental capacity to make the decision in question.