Skip to content
The Journal
Paper summary · July 2026

Electronic wills: what the law actually allows

An electronic-wills infrastructure has been specified — and does not yet exist.

Standard Index Group — in formation21 July 20266 min read572 words

In May 2025 the Law Commission of England and Wales recommended that electronic wills be capable of formal validity on an equal basis with paper wills, and published a draft Bill to do it. The recommendation is routinely reported as 'wills going digital' — which invites a specific misreading: that what is proposed is permission to sign a will on a screen. It is not.

This article summarises a Standard Index Group technical note, 'Electronic Wills after Modernising Wills Law' (SIG-TN-2026-04). The full note — the draft Bill's test limb by limb — is linked at the end.

Every paper formality — plus one

Under the draft Bill, an electronic will must satisfy every formality a paper will must satisfy — writing, signature, intention, two witnesses simultaneously present, attestation — and then one more that paper wills never face.

Requirement F demands a reliable system: one that links each signature to its signer at the moment of signing, that identifies the will so it can be distinguished from any copies, and that protects the will against alteration or destruction by anyone but the testator or a person the testator authorises.

Those three limbs are a custody system, an identity system, and a tamper-control system — all pretending to be one will-making formality.

What the Commission ruled out

The Commission's own analysis excludes most of what consumers currently understand by electronic signing: a typed name, a pasted image of a signature, and — on the Commission's expressed doubts — perhaps even a qualified electronic signature on its ordinary terms.

It also states plainly that storage on a home computer or a personal cloud account should not suffice to prove which file is the will. The distance between that standard and any tool in ordinary household use is the note's whole subject. The gap is not a drafting oversight; it is the design.

The honest summary of the reform: an electronic-wills infrastructure has been specified, and does not yet exist.

None of it is law

As the note records (as at June 2026), there is no full Government response, no Bill before Parliament, and no commencement date to wait for — readers should check the current position, but a recommendation is not a law. Meanwhile the pandemic-era video-witnessing concession expired on 31 January 2024.

A will made today is made under the formalities of 1837 — in the standard ceremony, a paper document, signed and witnessed by two witnesses physically present at the same time.

An electronically signed PDF cannot responsibly be treated as a will — whether electronic signing and witnessing can satisfy the formalities at all is uncertain and untested — and a will recorded on a phone is not a will: a recording is not writing.

What this means in practice

The distinction that matters is between preparing a will online and executing one electronically. The first is ordinary and lawful: a will can be drafted digitally today. The second is what the law does not yet provide for: the finished document must be printed, then signed and witnessed the 1837 way. Valoren's will service is built around exactly that line — the draft is prepared digitally, and the document is executed on paper, under the formalities as they actually stand.

This article summarises SIG-TN-2026-04, 'Electronic Wills after Modernising Wills Law' (Joel Patterson, June 2026), DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21462999 — linked below. Applies to England and Wales. This article is for information only.

● Last reviewed ·
Editorial register · Standard Index Group — in formation ·
● Sources
  1. 1.Law Commission, 'Modernising Wills Law' (Law Com No 419, 2025), Volumes I–II (report and draft Bill)
  2. 2.Wills Act 1837, s.9
  3. 3.SI 2020/952 and SI 2022/18 (video witnessing — expired 31 January 2024)
  4. 4.SIG-TN-2026-04, 'Electronic Wills after Modernising Wills Law', DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21462999
Published by Standard Index Group — in formation
Updated Jul 2026
From reading to ready

This guide is free, and it stays free. The Household Continuity Dossier renders your household's own version — your people, your accounts, your wishes — into a maintained record your executor or trusted person will actually reach for, kept current every year.

See The Household Continuity Dossier

Most people never need more than a guide like this one. If the situation behind it has stopped being simple — a trust, inheritance tax, foreign assets, a business, a dispute in view — Signum, Valoren’s own specialist desk, can take it on, and we say so plainly: it starts with a free intake, and if you do not need us, we will tell you. Prefer an independent adviser? STEP and the Chartered Institute of Taxation both keep public member directories — neither pays Valoren a referral fee.

The monthly note

Keep this piece — and get the monthly note.

Leave your email and we'll send a link to this essay plus the Valoren monthly note: one long-form essay, one statute-update brief, one anonymised case study a month.

Reply with any question and a person reads it.

Valoren is a trading name of Standard Index Group — in formation.
We never sell your data. We never spam. The unsubscribe link is in every email.

Free guides from the library
Browse all guides
The Journal · Monthly

One essay a month.
Substance, not noise.

One long-form essay, one statute-update brief, one anonymised case-study. From advisors@valoren.uk. Never shared. Never sold. One-click unsubscribe.

Part of a working library79form walkthroughs90+free guidesevery calculator & checker

We use first-party analytics only — no advertising or tracking third parties — to see which pages actually help people. You can keep that off. Anonymous error reports go to our error-monitoring processor so we can fix what breaks. Privacy